andrew wynne-mcbride

a w-m

andrew wynne-mcbride





Mother Clap & the Mollies
Homosexual Transgression in 18th Century Britain


By Royal Decree


In 1533, under the reign of Henry VIII, the Parliament of England passed The Buggery Act, which, for the first time, made anal intercourse punishable by civil law, enshrined as “the detestable and abominable Vice of Buggery committed with Mankind or Beast”. Before this, such acts were punishable only as sins against God in ecclesiastical courts, which for centuries had maintained the dominant and divine rule of the Church before the rise of the nation-state.

The consequences of being tried under the Buggery Act were numerous and severe: it was punishable as a capital offence, it allowed for the state to claim the possessions of the convicted person as its property, and it stated that “no person offending in any such offence shall be admitted to his Clergy”. This clause meant that monks, who at the time couldn’t even be executed for murder, could now be put to death for buggery by removing their religious protections. Enforcing this clause was central to Henry VIII's rule, allowing him to execute monks and nuns and seize monastic land, aiding him in establishing the Church of England, over which he claimed divine authority.

This threat of execution pressured homosexual men to meet in secrecy, which they appear to have done successfully, leaving little historical record of their gatherings throughout the 16th and 17th centuries. By the mid-17th century, only three convictions of buggery were recorded. Yet, these hidden networks eventually evolved into something new. Nearly 200 years later, at the turn of the 18th-century, a time of deep political unrest as England sought union with Scotland to form the United Kingdom, spaces known as Molly Houses began to emerge, giving rise to a homosexual subculture that, for some time, flourished beyond the eyes of law and religion. 



A version of this text was published in Tax Magazine Issue 03 in 2025.




Mother Clap & the Mollies
Homosexual Transgression in 18th Century Britain


By Royal Decree


In 1533, under the reign of Henry VIII, the Parliament of England passed The Buggery Act, which, for the first time, made anal intercourse punishable by civil law, enshrined as “the detestable and abominable Vice of Buggery committed with Mankind or Beast”. Before this, such acts were punishable only as sins against God in ecclesiastical courts, which for centuries had maintained the dominant and divine rule of the Church before the rise of the nation-state.

The consequences of being tried under the Buggery Act were numerous and severe: it was punishable as a capital offence, it allowed for the state to claim the possessions of the convicted person as its property, and it stated that “no person offending in any such offence shall be admitted to his Clergy”. This clause meant that monks, who at the time couldn’t even be executed for murder, could now be put to death for buggery by removing their religious protections. Enforcing this clause was central to Henry VIII's rule, allowing him to execute monks and nuns and seize monastic land, aiding him in establishing the Church of England, over which he claimed divine authority.

This threat of execution pressured homosexual men to meet in secrecy, which they appear to have done successfully, leaving little historical record of their gatherings throughout the 16th and 17th centuries. By the mid-17th century, only three convictions of buggery were recorded. Yet, these hidden networks eventually evolved into something new. Nearly 200 years later, at the turn of the 18th-century, a time of deep political unrest as England sought union with Scotland to form the United Kingdom, spaces known as Molly Houses began to emerge, giving rise to a homosexual subculture that, for some time, flourished beyond the eyes of law and religion. 





Mother Clap & the Mollies
Homosexual Transgression in 18th Century Britain


By Royal Decree


In 1533, under the reign of Henry VIII, the Parliament of England passed The Buggery Act, which, for the first time, made anal intercourse punishable by civil law, enshrined as “the detestable and abominable Vice of Buggery committed with Mankind or Beast”. Before this, such acts were punishable only as sins against God in ecclesiastical courts, which for centuries had maintained the dominant and divine rule of the Church before the rise of the nation-state.

The consequences of being tried under the Buggery Act were numerous and severe: it was punishable as a capital offence, it allowed for the state to claim the possessions of the convicted person as its property, and it stated that “no person offending in any such offence shall be admitted to his Clergy”. This clause meant that monks, who at the time couldn’t even be executed for murder, could now be put to death for buggery by removing their religious protections. Enforcing this clause was central to Henry VIII's rule, allowing him to execute monks and nuns and seize monastic land, aiding him in establishing the Church of England, over which he claimed divine authority.

This threat of execution pressured homosexual men to meet in secrecy, which they appear to have done successfully, leaving little historical record of their gatherings throughout the 16th and 17th centuries. By the mid-17th century, only three convictions of buggery were recorded. Yet, these hidden networks eventually evolved into something new. Nearly 200 years later, at the turn of the 18th-century, a time of deep political unrest as England sought union with Scotland to form the United Kingdom, spaces known as Molly Houses began to emerge, giving rise to a homosexual subculture that, for some time, flourished beyond the eyes of law and religion. 


The Houses, usually taverns, coffee houses, or rooms in private residences, were spaces where people could meet, drink, socialise, and fulfil their desire for illegal pleasures. While spread throughout the city, many houses were concentrated in specific boroughs, such as Covent Garden, Holborn and St. Giles, areas known for their thriving theatrical and artistic communities as well as their illicit activity. The Houses’ proximity to these communities provided a degree of cover, offering sanctuary from the threat of violence and persecution. The patrons who frequented these spaces called themselves Mollies, a term used positively for self-identification, since at the time there wasn’t language to describe the homosexual experience, beyond the biblical or legal labels of "sodomite" or “bugger.” 

During this period, marriage became the backbone of British society, as the state's growing demand for labour further entrenched rigid gender roles. Yet, Molly houses became spaces where these roles could be playfully satirised or critiqued. Popular activities included cross-dressing, mock-birth rituals, and marriage ceremonies. Many houses even contained rooms known as “chapels”, where patrons could “marry", while others celebrated their “unions.” Mollies would dress up and perform in these ceremonies together, sometimes even being recognised as husbands.

While the Mollies’ transgressive spirit managed to thrive at the beginning of the 18th century, the sound of their celebrations eventually echoed through the city. In 1709, Edward Ward published a scathing account of the Mollies in The London Spy, a periodical chronicling 18th-century life in the city, as their reputation began to grow:

“There are a particular Gang of Sodomitical Wretches, in this Town, who call themselves the Mollies, and are so far degenerated from all masculine Deportment, or manly Exercises, that they rather fancy themselves Women, imitating all the little Vanities that Custom has reconciled to the Female Sex, affecting to Speak, Walk, Tattle, Cursy, Cry, Scold, and to mimick all Manner of Effeminacy, that ever has fallen within their several Observations; not omitting the Indecencies of Lewd Women, that they may tempt one another by such immodest Freedoms to commit those odious Bestialities, that ought for ever to be without a Name.”


Ward’s derogatory description of the Mollies' effeminate behaviour reveals that his disdain was rooted, first and foremost, in the act of sodomy. Since categories such as “homosexual” or “heterosexual" didn’t exist yet, anal intercourse was so easily ascribed as the primary marker of the Mollies identity. Yet the violence of Ward’s language does more than describe sexual transgression, it marginalises the Mollies, neatly casting them as threatening “other,” positioning them as a challenge to the moral order of Georgian London.  

As attention on the Mollies grew, their activities attracted the gaze of the Society for the Reformation of Manners, a coalition of civilians and police, whose aim was to suppress behaviour seen as offensive to the code of Church and Crown. Backed by both parties, the Society played a pivotal role in the perception and prosecution of homosexuality in British Society. By the 1720s, they had garnered a formidable reputation and were responsible for numerous raids on Molly Houses across London. 


One of the most historically significant Houses was that of Margaret Clap’s, or ‘Mother Clap’ as she was more affectionately known. Clap operated her Molly House on Field Lane in Holborn, west of the City of London. At the time, the area was notorious for criminal activity and was largely avoided by police. Clap’s Molly House was part of her home, where she welcomed patrons and accepted payment for the use of her rooms and ales. Known to care for her clientele, Clap appeared in court on occasion as a character witness for Mollies, and even allowed some to live with her for extended periods, with one patron in particular known to have stayed for years.

On a Sunday evening in February 1726, Mother Clap's Molly House was raided. The police meticulously blocked all escape routes to prevent any Mollies from fleeing. After searching the house room by room, they arrested approximately 40 people, sending them to Newgate prison. While most were eventually released, five men, and Mother Clap herself, were ultimately brought to trial.


Rouged Cheeks Unfolding 

He positioned himself at the end of the alley. A tallow candle burnt in the window behind him, the acrid mix of rendered beef fat and burning tobacco mingling with shrieks and giggles. Murmurs of gatherings where men might fancy themselves women had begun to treacle the walls, enticing idle gossip into intrigue. The windowsill sat just above eye level, conveniently rejecting the attention of violent eyes. To the left of the window stood a door: a thick piece of oak painted oxblood red, its frame warped and blistering. At its centre, a small peephole, slightly larger than the eye of a needle, covered from the inside. Curiosity had brought him here, shaping his desire into a sharp point, closing the gap between him and the door, but it would take more than curiosity and desire to lead him inside.

Two figures approached from the opposite end of the alley.Drawing nearer, their image shaped into his view. Two men, in wool breeches and linen shirts, sharing a flocked velvet coat, draped across both their shoulders, binding them together. Their faces powdered and cheeks rouged, tiny little speckles of dust trailing behind them. He watched them knock on the door, whispering something through the peephole before it began to open just enough to let them inside. Suddenly, his desire was given a direction, the opening marking a trajectory forwards. He lunged towards the door, slipping in the gap behind the couple.



At once he was confronted with a series of radical obstacles. In the corner, three men gathered around a table, their hands reaching in and under each other's unbuttoned shirts. One of them delicately circled his finger around another’s nipple, his neck caulked back in pleasure, sweat cascading down his chest. At the other side of the room, a long oak bar punctuated the space, littered with mugs of ale, the two men he had followed inside taking their seats in front of it. Another man lay bent over the far end, a panel of his breeches removed in the rear, exposing his buttocks. Behind him, a tall man in formal dress tickled him with a feather, eliciting giddy little sounds with each stroke. In the centre of the room a set of stairs led upwards, where another group of men, all adorned in sheaths of white lace, silk, pink ribbons, and tattered corsets, made their way up. 

A woman stood behind the bar. As she served the men surrounding her, they addressed her as “Mother”. She slid a mug of ale toward him, beckoning him closer. Her eyes invited an openness; they unwrapped him, unfolding the creases in his skin. She reached down, dipping her finger into a small pot, gesturing him nearer still. He watched in the mirror behind the bar, as she began to draw crimson circles onto the apples of his cheeks. Staring back at his reflection he fixed himself on an image he didn't recognise but longed to hold onto. He imagined the circles staining his skin, his cheeks permanently rouged, his image a beacon, drawing others closer to him. When she was done, she pointed towards the stairs, ushering him onwards.



Ascending he found a room with the same group of men in gilded states of undress. In the centre, two of them stood facing each other. One in a waistcoat, his chest and arms exposed, breeches falling just below his knees. The other wore a veil attached to a wig, with a loosely tied corset wrapped around his waist, filled out by a chest of hair in place of breasts. Torn stockings climbed his legs, held by garters encircling equally hairy thighs. Crashing into his image, he felt reality flicker, the edges of his understanding blurring. The veiled figure leaned toward the other man, and as they kissed, the room burst into rapture: bodies jumping and shrieking, sound enveloping him, the violent thudding on the floor making dust cascade from the roof, a poor man's confetti. The men formed a circle around the couple, dancing around in frenzy. 

He stood fixed in place, watching as the merry-go-round of bodies spun before him, the image of the couple at the centre. As the circle continued to turn, a hand broke free, reaching out to pull him in. Catching the cuff of his shirt, he was yanked into motion. Round and round they went, the circle whirling, until it could no longer hold itself upright, dizziness setting in as one by one they collapsed to the floor. The man who had pulled him in began to waiver, his head spinning as he dragged them both to the ground. The group's tempered cheers dissolved into laughter.

The stranger turned to face him, watching the blood rush to his head as the rouged circles on his cheeks blended seamlessly with his skin. He admired him, like some perfectly ripe fruit. As they kissed, all the edges disintegrated, slipping between each other's skin. He stared up into the face of this unknown figure, his moustache traced a line around his upper lip. His body couldn't hold him anymore; somewhere in their collision, all the creases unfolded. Beyond the walls of this house violence drew closer, cutting him in sharp lines, but in here, he overflowed, fully saturated. 




The Residue of Desire

Of the five men brought to trial following the raid on Mother Clap’s house, two managed to escape death, while the remaining three were publicly executed at Tyburn before crowds of the city. It was only after the trials of the Mollies that Clap herself was finally brought to the stands, charged with keeping a disorderly house. In her defence she argued that “it will be considered that I am a Woman, and therefore it cannot be thought that I would ever be concerned in such Practices.” She was found guilty and sentenced to stand on the pillory at Smithfield, pay a fine of 20 marks, and serve two years in prison. Records describe how, during her time on the pillory, she was treated so violently by onlookers that she had to be carried away in convulsing fits. Nothing further is recorded of Clap’s life, and it is believed she died in prison.

The raid on Clap’s house and the execution of her patrons were direct consequences of the Society’s violent manifest. The spread of their doctrine marked a seismic shift in the perception and prosecution of homosexuality in British Society. In the aftermath of the trials, revelations about Molly subculture provoked widespread outrage. The front page of The London Journal, dated May 7 1726, violently condemned the events, detailing the locations of major cruising spots across the city, stating that those executed could “neither expect Pity or Compassion, because they die for Crimes detestable both to God and Man.” From this moment forward, a broader understanding of homosexual culture took shape: the act of anal sex became intrinsically tied to the identity of gay men, their lives framed as sinful, illegal and abhorrent, a stain on society.

In the canon of queer British history, Clap’s legacy, her molly house, and its patrons deserves significant recognition. Her act of care, of creating a space for people at risk of execution to express themselves and pursue their desires, was profoundly radical, especially given the period in which it occurred. She was neither a man, nor a Molly herself, and had no vested interest in running the space beyond kindness and kinship. If her motivations had been financial, there were far safer and more lucrative paths she could have pursued. Running her establishment actively placed her life in jeopardy, a risk she must have understood. Yet, as is so often the case, despite their importance, stories like hers so easily fade into history.  

While the raids and trials of 18th-century Molly Houses provide some of the earliest recorded accounts of homosexual subculture in Britain, this does not mean that such subcultures were absent in the centuries before. Letters, poetry, art and other cultural artefacts reveal a long-standing history of homosexual desire and transgression, one that existed for centuries worldwide, well before the Mollies of Georgian London, and continued well afterward, gradually moving from guarded spaces of secrecy into broader public life. Yet it is the existence of groups like the Mollies, and their public and violent persecution, that forced wider society to confront an image of homosexual desire, setting in motion a chain of events that would slowly begin to erode social attitudes in the coming centuries. 

Oriented toward their story, we might ask what it is that we inherit from past subcultures, and in what way their actions and legacies continue to linger. The rituals of performance that took place in Molly Houses, including marriage ceremonies, envisioned futures which would take some 300 years to fully realise. Their camp enactments of femininity and satirising of rigid gender roles remain wholly relevant to subcultural practices today. The echoes of their transgressive acts leave a residue across time, opening space for other bodies to stretch and expand the boundaries they established. Thus more than ever, it remains true that we are tethered to the past, listening for the echoes of the people who have come before us to show us the way. 


_________



A version of this text was published in Tax Magazine Issue 03 in 2025.

about

projects

writing

photography

talks